LETTER: Huge federal spending bills aren’t good for Nevada

I was not amused by the Review-Journal’s Monday communicative astir the $1.2 trillion infrastructure measure and its large benefits for Nevada. The nonfiction noted that our senators — Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen — “were capable to tuck wealth for Nevada into the bill.”

The nonfiction applauded the $4 cardinal that Nevada would see. Sounds similar a lot.

Let’s spot … Nevada has 2 percent of each senators, our colonisation is astir 0.9 percent of the U.S. colonisation and our senators managed to tuck successful lone 0.3 percent of the full bundle for Nevada. Do we truly deliberation that they are doing a bully job?

Now they are advocates for the whopping $3.5 trillion (or is it truly $5 trillion) measure to “remake” the United States. Inflation is moving away. Employment is inactive acold abbreviated of pre-pandemic levels. That’s aft the $5 trillion allocated successful 3 erstwhile COVID-related bills.

Our politicians look intent connected destroying our system by outrageous, debt-financed spending. The program is to make wealthiness by simply printing much money. What a fanciful idea! Do not judge that lone the affluent radical and corporations volition wage for it. We volition each wage for it.

On full and connected average, Nevada is simply a mean state. I deliberation we would truly enactment a mean attack to governance and spending. Why would we bent connected the coattails of the New York and California progressives? They don’t correspond us.